[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":46},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-credit_adv_law-23-014":3},{"exam":4,"examName":5,"chapterSlug":6,"question":7,"related":22},"credit_adv_law","進階授信人員專業能力測驗——授信法規","c1",{"id":8,"exam":4,"session":9,"qno":10,"question":11,"options":12,"answer":17,"chapter":18,"freq":19,"explanation":20,"difficulty":21},"credit_adv_law-23-014","23",14,"依票據法規定，見票即付之本票，對發票人之票據上之權利的時效期間，係自何日起算三年？",[13,14,15,16],"自發票日","自提示日","自付款日","自作成拒絕證書日",0,"授信基本法律",1,"票據法對票據上的權利設有短期時效，對匯票承兌人及本票發票人的請求權為三年，起算日則視票據性質而定：定有到期日者自到期日起算；見票即付之本票沒有到期日可言，一經發票即得隨時請求付款，故明定自發票日起算，(A)正確。(B)提示日由執票人自行決定，若以此起算等於任由時效無限延後，與時效安定法律關係的目的相違；(C)付款日只是實際受償之日，票據未獲付款時根本不存在；(D)作成拒絕證書是行使追索權的保全手續，與對主債務人的三年時效起算無關。銀行收受本票作擔保時，應以發票日推算並適時行使權利。","medium",[23,26,30,34,38,42],{"id":24,"question":25,"qno":19},"credit_adv_law-23-001","有關銀行法第三十條反面承諾，下列敘述何者錯誤？",{"id":27,"question":28,"qno":29},"credit_adv_law-23-002","銀行辦理消費性放款，下列敘述何者正確？",2,{"id":31,"question":32,"qno":33},"credit_adv_law-23-003","依銀行法規定，下列敘述何者錯誤？",3,{"id":35,"question":36,"qno":37},"credit_adv_law-23-004","下列何者非屬甲金融控股公司之子公司？",4,{"id":39,"question":40,"qno":41},"credit_adv_law-23-005","乙銀行為甲金融控股公司之銀行子公司，丙公司為甲金融控股公司之關係企業。依金融控股公司法規定，乙銀行購買丙公司所發行之有價證券，其交易金額不得超過多少？",5,{"id":43,"question":44,"qno":45},"credit_adv_law-23-006","同一業別金融機構合併時，因合併而有逾越法令規定範圍者，主管機關應命其限期調整；若逾越一般法令之調整期限及逾越銀行法令有關關係人授信或同一人、同一關係人或同一關係企業授信規定者之調整期限，分別為多久？",6,1785170288725]