[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":45},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-credit_adv_law-23-018":3},{"exam":4,"examName":5,"chapterSlug":6,"question":7,"related":22},"credit_adv_law","進階授信人員專業能力測驗——授信法規","c1",{"id":8,"exam":4,"session":9,"qno":10,"question":11,"options":12,"answer":17,"chapter":18,"freq":19,"explanation":20,"difficulty":21},"credit_adv_law-23-018","23",18,"債務人甲公司主事務所設於新店區，連帶保證人乙之住所地在台中市，連帶保證人丙之住所地在台南市，如對同一債權依督促程序發支付命令，管轄法院為何？",[13,14,15,16],"視債權人所在地而定","適用合意管轄，由台北地院管轄","甲台北地院，乙台中地院，丙台南地院","因事涉三地，故由高等法院管轄",2,"授信基本法律",1,"督促程序採專屬管轄，支付命令應向債務人普通審判籍所在地的法院聲請，法人依主事務所或主營業所所在地、自然人依住所地定之，且不得以合意變更。甲公司主事務所在新北市新店區，屬臺灣臺北地方法院轄區；連帶保證人乙住臺中市、丙住臺南市，分別由臺中、臺南地方法院管轄，銀行必須向三個法院分別聲請，故(C)正確。(A)債權人所在地不是督促程序的管轄連結因素；(B)專屬管轄排除合意管轄，契約約定不能拘束法院；(D)支付命令屬第一審程序，高等法院不會成為督促程序的管轄法院。","hard",[23,26,29,33,37,41],{"id":24,"question":25,"qno":19},"credit_adv_law-23-001","有關銀行法第三十條反面承諾，下列敘述何者錯誤？",{"id":27,"question":28,"qno":17},"credit_adv_law-23-002","銀行辦理消費性放款，下列敘述何者正確？",{"id":30,"question":31,"qno":32},"credit_adv_law-23-003","依銀行法規定，下列敘述何者錯誤？",3,{"id":34,"question":35,"qno":36},"credit_adv_law-23-004","下列何者非屬甲金融控股公司之子公司？",4,{"id":38,"question":39,"qno":40},"credit_adv_law-23-005","乙銀行為甲金融控股公司之銀行子公司，丙公司為甲金融控股公司之關係企業。依金融控股公司法規定，乙銀行購買丙公司所發行之有價證券，其交易金額不得超過多少？",5,{"id":42,"question":43,"qno":44},"credit_adv_law-23-006","同一業別金融機構合併時，因合併而有逾越法令規定範圍者，主管機關應命其限期調整；若逾越一般法令之調整期限及逾越銀行法令有關關係人授信或同一人、同一關係人或同一關係企業授信規定者之調整期限，分別為多久？",6,1785170288758]