[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":45},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-credit_adv_law-24-014":3},{"exam":4,"examName":5,"chapterSlug":6,"question":7,"related":21},"credit_adv_law","進階授信人員專業能力測驗——授信法規","c1",{"id":8,"exam":4,"session":9,"qno":10,"question":11,"options":12,"answer":17,"chapter":18,"freq":17,"explanation":19,"difficulty":20},"credit_adv_law-24-014","24",14,"依票據法有關保付支票之規定，下列敘述何者正確？",[13,14,15,16],"執票人於不獲付款時，得對發票人行使追索權","支票喪失時，得聲請公示催告","支票喪失時，得為止付之通知","執票人於不獲付款時，得對背書人主張背書責任",1,"授信基本法律","付款人在支票上記載「照付」或「保付」後，票據責任整個轉由付款人絕對承擔，票據法同時明文排除止付通知、提示期限及期限經過後付款三項規定的適用。止付既被排除，保付支票遺失時不能辦理掛失止付；但公示催告與除權判決是民事訴訟法的制度，票據法並未一併排除，執票人仍可循此途徑救濟，故 (B) 正確。(C) 正好踩在被排除的止付規定上，保付支票不得為止付之通知。(A) 與 (D) 則忽略保付的免責效果：付款人保付後，發票人及背書人均免除其責任，執票人只能向付款人請求，既不能對發票人行使追索權，也無從要求背書人負背書責任。","medium",[22,25,29,33,37,41],{"id":23,"question":24,"qno":17},"credit_adv_law-23-001","有關銀行法第三十條反面承諾，下列敘述何者錯誤？",{"id":26,"question":27,"qno":28},"credit_adv_law-23-002","銀行辦理消費性放款，下列敘述何者正確？",2,{"id":30,"question":31,"qno":32},"credit_adv_law-23-003","依銀行法規定，下列敘述何者錯誤？",3,{"id":34,"question":35,"qno":36},"credit_adv_law-23-004","下列何者非屬甲金融控股公司之子公司？",4,{"id":38,"question":39,"qno":40},"credit_adv_law-23-005","乙銀行為甲金融控股公司之銀行子公司，丙公司為甲金融控股公司之關係企業。依金融控股公司法規定，乙銀行購買丙公司所發行之有價證券，其交易金額不得超過多少？",5,{"id":42,"question":43,"qno":44},"credit_adv_law-23-006","同一業別金融機構合併時，因合併而有逾越法令規定範圍者，主管機關應命其限期調整；若逾越一般法令之調整期限及逾越銀行法令有關關係人授信或同一人、同一關係人或同一關係企業授信規定者之調整期限，分別為多久？",6,1785170289219]