[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":45},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-credit_adv_law-24-017":3},{"exam":4,"examName":5,"chapterSlug":6,"question":7,"related":21},"credit_adv_law","進階授信人員專業能力測驗——授信法規","c1",{"id":8,"exam":4,"session":9,"qno":10,"question":11,"options":12,"answer":17,"chapter":18,"freq":17,"explanation":19,"difficulty":20},"credit_adv_law-24-017","24",17,"依民事訴訟法規定，有關訴訟上和解成立者，當事人得聲請退還裁判費之規定，下列敘述何者正確？",[13,14,15,16],"得聲請退還其於該審級所繳裁判費三分之一","得聲請退還其於該審級所繳裁判費三分之二","得聲請退還其於該審級所繳裁判費全部","和解成立者與確定判決有同一之效力，訴訟費用不可退還",1,"授信基本法律","民事訴訟法讓訴訟上和解的當事人取回大部分裁判費，用意在鼓勵息訟：和解成立者，當事人得於成立之日起三個月內聲請退還其於該審級所繳裁判費三分之二，故 (B) 正確。要記牢的是比例為三分之二，且聲請有三個月的期間限制，逾期即不得再請求。(A) 把比例記成三分之一，是最常見的數字互換。(C) 全額退還並不成立，保留三分之一是對已耗用司法資源的合理分擔。(D) 前半段沒錯，和解成立與確定判決有同一之效力，但由此推出訴訟費用一律不可退還則與退費規定牴觸；銀行訴追案件成立和解時，應記得一併聲請退費以降低訴訟成本。","medium",[22,25,29,33,37,41],{"id":23,"question":24,"qno":17},"credit_adv_law-23-001","有關銀行法第三十條反面承諾，下列敘述何者錯誤？",{"id":26,"question":27,"qno":28},"credit_adv_law-23-002","銀行辦理消費性放款，下列敘述何者正確？",2,{"id":30,"question":31,"qno":32},"credit_adv_law-23-003","依銀行法規定，下列敘述何者錯誤？",3,{"id":34,"question":35,"qno":36},"credit_adv_law-23-004","下列何者非屬甲金融控股公司之子公司？",4,{"id":38,"question":39,"qno":40},"credit_adv_law-23-005","乙銀行為甲金融控股公司之銀行子公司，丙公司為甲金融控股公司之關係企業。依金融控股公司法規定，乙銀行購買丙公司所發行之有價證券，其交易金額不得超過多少？",5,{"id":42,"question":43,"qno":44},"credit_adv_law-23-006","同一業別金融機構合併時，因合併而有逾越法令規定範圍者，主管機關應命其限期調整；若逾越一般法令之調整期限及逾越銀行法令有關關係人授信或同一人、同一關係人或同一關係企業授信規定者之調整期限，分別為多久？",6,1785170289257]