[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":45},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-credit_adv_law-25-014":3},{"exam":4,"examName":5,"chapterSlug":6,"question":7,"related":22},"credit_adv_law","進階授信人員專業能力測驗——授信法規","c1",{"id":8,"exam":4,"session":9,"qno":10,"question":11,"options":12,"answer":17,"chapter":18,"freq":19,"explanation":20,"difficulty":21},"credit_adv_law-25-014","25",14,"依票據法有關票據金額支付利息之規定，下列敘述何者錯誤？",[13,14,15,16],"本票發票人得記載對於票據金額支付利息及其利率","對於匯票金額支付利息者，其利率未經載明時，定為年利六釐","對於本票金額支付利息者，其利息起算日未經特約時，自票據到期日起算","支票發票人於票據上記載對於票據金額支付利息及利率者，不生票據上之效力",2,"授信基本法律",1,"票據法允許匯票、本票的發票人在票上記載支付利息及其利率，利率未經載明時定為年利六釐，而利息自發票日起算，除非另有特約。(C) 稱未經特約時自票據到期日起算，把起算點往後挪，與規定相反，是錯誤敘述，故選 (C)。(A) 本票準用匯票之規定，發票人自得為此記載；(B) 年利六釐即年息百分之六，屬法定補充利率，避免當事人只寫利息卻漏填利率而生爭議；(D) 支票是支付工具而非信用工具，見票即付、原則上不生計息問題，票據法未準用利息條款，縱使在支票上記載利息，也只是票據外的約定，不生票據上之效力。","hard",[23,26,29,33,37,41],{"id":24,"question":25,"qno":19},"credit_adv_law-23-001","有關銀行法第三十條反面承諾，下列敘述何者錯誤？",{"id":27,"question":28,"qno":17},"credit_adv_law-23-002","銀行辦理消費性放款，下列敘述何者正確？",{"id":30,"question":31,"qno":32},"credit_adv_law-23-003","依銀行法規定，下列敘述何者錯誤？",3,{"id":34,"question":35,"qno":36},"credit_adv_law-23-004","下列何者非屬甲金融控股公司之子公司？",4,{"id":38,"question":39,"qno":40},"credit_adv_law-23-005","乙銀行為甲金融控股公司之銀行子公司，丙公司為甲金融控股公司之關係企業。依金融控股公司法規定，乙銀行購買丙公司所發行之有價證券，其交易金額不得超過多少？",5,{"id":42,"question":43,"qno":44},"credit_adv_law-23-006","同一業別金融機構合併時，因合併而有逾越法令規定範圍者，主管機關應命其限期調整；若逾越一般法令之調整期限及逾越銀行法令有關關係人授信或同一人、同一關係人或同一關係企業授信規定者之調整期限，分別為多久？",6,1785170289716]