[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":45},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-credit_prac-45-008":3},{"exam":4,"examName":5,"chapterSlug":6,"question":7,"related":21},"credit_prac","初階授信人員專業能力測驗——授信實務","c1",{"id":8,"exam":4,"session":9,"qno":10,"question":11,"options":12,"answer":17,"chapter":18,"freq":17,"explanation":19,"difficulty":20},"credit_prac-45-008","45",8,"依消費者保護法規定，銀行與客戶經由個別磋商之約定事項，其適用之效力為何？",[13,14,15,16],"與定型化契約之一般條款之效力相同","優先於定型化契約之一般條款","定型化契約之一般條款優先於個別約定事項","該法並無規定",1,"基礎授信","消費者保護法第十五條規定,定型化契約中之一般條款牴觸個別磋商條款之約定者,其牴觸部分無效,換句話說,銀行與客戶逐條談出來的個別約定,效力優先於銀行事先單方擬好的定型化條款,故選 (B)。理由在於定型化條款是企業經營者為與多數人訂約而預先擬定,客戶沒有實質議約空間;個別磋商條款則是雙方真正合意的結果,更貼近當事人真意,自應優先適用。(A) 把兩者效力等同看待,忽略法律刻意給予的優先順位;(C) 順序完全顛倒,將使個別磋商流於形式;(D) 稱該法未規定,與第十五條明文相違。","medium",[22,25,29,33,37,41],{"id":23,"question":24,"qno":17},"credit_prac-45-001","有關銀行辦理授信業務應把握之基本原則，下列何者錯誤？",{"id":26,"question":27,"qno":28},"credit_prac-45-003","銀行法對於銀行辦理授信，其有關授信用途與授信期間之規範，下列敘述何者錯誤？",3,{"id":30,"question":31,"qno":32},"credit_prac-45-004","銀行未於借貸契約中，與借款人議定行使加速條款之事由及效果，恐違反下列何法規？",4,{"id":34,"question":35,"qno":36},"credit_prac-45-006","授信評估五 P 原則中，下列何種因素有「銀行收回貸款之第二道保障」之稱？",6,{"id":38,"question":39,"qno":40},"credit_prac-45-007","外國銀行在中華民國境內設立分行營業，須經中華民國政府的核准許可後，始可開業，此制度屬於下列何者？",7,{"id":42,"question":43,"qno":44},"credit_prac-45-009","下列何種銀行業務屬於「消費借貸」行為？",9,1785146813007]