[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":45},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sec_law-115-2-013":3},{"exam":4,"examName":5,"chapterSlug":6,"question":7,"related":22},"sec_law","證券商業務員資格測驗——證券交易相關法規與實務","c1",{"id":8,"exam":4,"session":9,"qno":10,"question":11,"options":12,"answer":17,"chapter":18,"freq":19,"explanation":20,"difficulty":21},"sec_law-115-2-013","115-2",13,"保護機構發現上市、上櫃或興櫃公司之董事有何種情事，得訴請法院裁判解任公司之董事？",[13,14,15,16],"財務報告虛偽違反證券交易法第二十條第二項規定","操縱股價違反第一百五十五條第一項規定","內線交易違反第一百五十七條之一第一項規定","選項(A)(B)(C)皆是",3,"證券交易法(含施行細則)",1,"證券投資人及期貨交易人保護法賦予保護機構訴請法院裁判解任董事、監察人的權限，只要發現其執行業務有重大損害公司之行為，或有違反法令、章程之重大事項即可提起，不受持股比例與持股期間的限制。(A) 財務報告虛偽不實違反證券交易法第二十條第二項、(B) 操縱股價違反第一百五十五條第一項、(C) 內線交易違反第一百五十七條之一第一項，三者都是證券法上最典型的重大違法行為，自然全部涵蓋在內，故 (D) 為正解。這項設計正好補上少數股東不易依公司法發動解任訴訟的缺口。","medium",[23,26,30,34,37,41],{"id":24,"question":25,"qno":17},"sec_law-114-3-003","下列何者不是「證券交易法」上所稱之「發行人」？",{"id":27,"question":28,"qno":29},"sec_law-114-3-011","內線交易情節重大者，法院得提高賠償額之倍數為下列何者？",11,{"id":31,"question":32,"qno":33},"sec_law-114-3-012","Z 上市公司(下稱 Z 公司)董事甲得知該公司即將獲得國際大廠的重大訂單，在該消息明確後，未公開前，於市場上進行交易。下列何者不會構成內線交易之違反？",12,{"id":35,"question":36,"qno":10},"sec_law-114-3-013","依照證交法之規定，下列何者非為內線交易規範主體？",{"id":38,"question":39,"qno":40},"sec_law-114-3-024","仲裁庭認定仲裁達於可為判斷之程度者，依當事人聲明之事項，應於幾日內作成判斷書？",24,{"id":42,"question":43,"qno":44},"sec_law-114-3-030","公開收購如全部應賣有價證券之數量，超過所預定之收購數量時，公開收購人應依下列何種方式向應賣人購買？",30,1785904140270]