[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":46},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sec_law-115-2-019":3},{"exam":4,"examName":5,"chapterSlug":6,"question":7,"related":21},"sec_law","證券商業務員資格測驗——證券交易相關法規與實務","c1",{"id":8,"exam":4,"session":9,"qno":10,"question":11,"options":12,"answer":17,"chapter":18,"freq":17,"explanation":19,"difficulty":20},"sec_law-115-2-019","115-2",19,"上市公司董事經法院裁判解任確定後，自裁判確定日起，幾年內不得充任上市、上櫃或興櫃公司之董事、監察人及依公司法第二十七條第一項規定受指定代表行使職務之自然人？",[13,14,15,16],"1 年","3 年","5 年","10 年",1,"證券交易法(含施行細則)","證券投資人及期貨交易人保護法規定，董事、監察人經保護機構訴請法院裁判解任確定後，自裁判確定日起三年內，不得充任上市、上櫃或興櫃公司之董事、監察人，也不得擔任依公司法第二十七條第一項規定受指定代表行使職務的自然人，故 (B) 正確。若只解任現職而不設冷卻期，被解任者換一家公司照樣任職，解任制度的嚇阻效果會被完全架空。(A) 一年過短，難以形成實質警惕；(C) 五年與 (D) 十年則超出本法所定的失格期間，處罰程度與制度設計並不相符。","medium",[22,26,30,34,38,42],{"id":23,"question":24,"qno":25},"sec_law-114-3-003","下列何者不是「證券交易法」上所稱之「發行人」？",3,{"id":27,"question":28,"qno":29},"sec_law-114-3-011","內線交易情節重大者，法院得提高賠償額之倍數為下列何者？",11,{"id":31,"question":32,"qno":33},"sec_law-114-3-012","Z 上市公司(下稱 Z 公司)董事甲得知該公司即將獲得國際大廠的重大訂單，在該消息明確後，未公開前，於市場上進行交易。下列何者不會構成內線交易之違反？",12,{"id":35,"question":36,"qno":37},"sec_law-114-3-013","依照證交法之規定，下列何者非為內線交易規範主體？",13,{"id":39,"question":40,"qno":41},"sec_law-114-3-024","仲裁庭認定仲裁達於可為判斷之程度者，依當事人聲明之事項，應於幾日內作成判斷書？",24,{"id":43,"question":44,"qno":45},"sec_law-114-3-030","公開收購如全部應賣有價證券之數量，超過所預定之收購數量時，公開收購人應依下列何種方式向應賣人購買？",30,1785904140322]