[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":47},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sec_law-115-2-022":3},{"exam":4,"examName":5,"chapterSlug":6,"question":7,"related":22},"sec_law","證券商業務員資格測驗——證券交易相關法規與實務","c1",{"id":8,"exam":4,"session":9,"qno":10,"question":11,"options":12,"answer":17,"chapter":18,"freq":19,"explanation":20,"difficulty":21},"sec_law-115-2-022","115-2",22,"依「證券投資人及期貨交易人保護法」規定，保護機構為保護公益，於本法及其捐助章程所定目的範圍內，對於造成多數證券投資人或期貨交易人受損害之同一原因所引起之證券、期貨事件，得由___以上證券投資人或期貨交易人授與仲裁或訴訟實施權後，以___之名義，提付仲裁或起訴？",[13,14,15,16],"二十人；保護機構","二十人；證券投資人或期貨交易人","三十人；保護機構","三十人；證券投資人或期貨交易人",0,"證券交易法(含施行細則)",1,"證券投資人及期貨交易人保護法規定，保護機構為保護公益，於本法及其捐助章程所定目的範圍內，就造成多數投資人受損害之同一原因所引起的證券、期貨事件，得由二十人以上證券投資人或期貨交易人授與仲裁或訴訟實施權後，以自己也就是保護機構的名義提付仲裁或起訴，故 (A) 正確。由保護機構具名的好處是案件集中處理，大幅降低個別投資人的訴訟成本與舉證壓力。(C)(D) 的三十人不是法定人數；(B)(D) 把名義人寫成投資人本人，與團體訴訟由保護機構出面的設計不符。","medium",[23,27,31,35,39,43],{"id":24,"question":25,"qno":26},"sec_law-114-3-003","下列何者不是「證券交易法」上所稱之「發行人」？",3,{"id":28,"question":29,"qno":30},"sec_law-114-3-011","內線交易情節重大者，法院得提高賠償額之倍數為下列何者？",11,{"id":32,"question":33,"qno":34},"sec_law-114-3-012","Z 上市公司(下稱 Z 公司)董事甲得知該公司即將獲得國際大廠的重大訂單，在該消息明確後，未公開前，於市場上進行交易。下列何者不會構成內線交易之違反？",12,{"id":36,"question":37,"qno":38},"sec_law-114-3-013","依照證交法之規定，下列何者非為內線交易規範主體？",13,{"id":40,"question":41,"qno":42},"sec_law-114-3-024","仲裁庭認定仲裁達於可為判斷之程度者，依當事人聲明之事項，應於幾日內作成判斷書？",24,{"id":44,"question":45,"qno":46},"sec_law-114-3-030","公開收購如全部應賣有價證券之數量，超過所預定之收購數量時，公開收購人應依下列何種方式向應賣人購買？",30,1785904140370]