[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":47},["ShallowReactive",2],{"q-sec_law-115-2-025":3},{"exam":4,"examName":5,"chapterSlug":6,"question":7,"related":22},"sec_law","證券商業務員資格測驗——證券交易相關法規與實務","c1",{"id":8,"exam":4,"session":9,"qno":10,"question":11,"options":12,"answer":17,"chapter":18,"freq":19,"explanation":20,"difficulty":21},"sec_law-115-2-025","115-2",25,"內線交易情節重大者，法院得將損害賠償義務人之賠償額提高三倍，其前提要件為何？",[13,14,15,16],"經調查屬實，由法院逕依職權為之","須由同案刑事部分之檢察官請求","須有損害賠償請求權人之請求","須經證券主管機關之請求",2,"證券交易法(含施行細則)",1,"證券交易法第一百五十七條之一的內線交易民事責任，賠償額原則上是違法者的買賣價格，與消息公開後十個營業日收盤平均價格之差額；情節重大時法院得將賠償額提高至三倍，但必須由善意從事相反買賣之人，也就是損害賠償請求權人提出請求，法院不能主動加重，故 (C) 正確。這符合民事訴訟不告不理、由當事人自行處分權利的原則。(A) 依職權逕行提高與此原則牴觸；(B) 檢察官負責的是刑事追訴，無權替被害人主張民事賠償；(D) 主管機關同樣不是民事請求權人，無從代為請求。","medium",[23,27,31,35,39,43],{"id":24,"question":25,"qno":26},"sec_law-114-3-003","下列何者不是「證券交易法」上所稱之「發行人」？",3,{"id":28,"question":29,"qno":30},"sec_law-114-3-011","內線交易情節重大者，法院得提高賠償額之倍數為下列何者？",11,{"id":32,"question":33,"qno":34},"sec_law-114-3-012","Z 上市公司(下稱 Z 公司)董事甲得知該公司即將獲得國際大廠的重大訂單，在該消息明確後，未公開前，於市場上進行交易。下列何者不會構成內線交易之違反？",12,{"id":36,"question":37,"qno":38},"sec_law-114-3-013","依照證交法之規定，下列何者非為內線交易規範主體？",13,{"id":40,"question":41,"qno":42},"sec_law-114-3-024","仲裁庭認定仲裁達於可為判斷之程度者，依當事人聲明之事項，應於幾日內作成判斷書？",24,{"id":44,"question":45,"qno":46},"sec_law-114-3-030","公開收購如全部應賣有價證券之數量，超過所預定之收購數量時，公開收購人應依下列何種方式向應賣人購買？",30,1785904140386]